Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 10, 2025

Stelly v. Martinez Detention Facility

Judge
Jacquelyn Corley
Docket
3:25-cv-01975
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil RightsCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Kamani Courvoisier Stelly v. Martinez Detention Facility, Judge Corley dismissed the case with prejudice after no amended complaint was filed.

Who this affects

The dismissal ends Kamani Courvoisier Stelly's case against Martinez Detention Facility and directs entry of judgment.

What happened

Kamani Courvoisier Stelly v. Martinez Detention Facility began with a civil-rights complaint that the court dismissed on July 18, 2025, because it did not present a legally recognized claim for relief.

The court gave Stelly 28 days to file an amended complaint and warned that the case would be dismissed if he did not. He did not file an amended complaint, ask for more time, or explain why he had not done so.

Judge Jacquelyn Scott Corley dismissed the case with prejudice, directed the Clerk to enter judgment, and closed the file.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Stelly v. Martinez Detention Facility · No. 3:25-cv-01975
Judge
Jacquelyn Corley
Date
Oct. 10, 2025

Background

The plaintiff filed a civil-rights complaint against Martinez Detention Facility. On July 18, 2025, the court dismissed the complaint for failure to present a cognizable claim for relief. The court gave the plaintiff 28 days to file an amended complaint and warned that failure to do so would result in dismissal.

The opinion states that the plaintiff did not file an amended complaint, request an extension of time, or show cause—provide a reason—why he had not filed one. A footnote states that the plaintiff filed a notice of change of address on August 4, 2025, and that the Clerk sent the order granting leave to amend to his new address on September 3, 2025; the plaintiff still did not file an amended complaint.

Ruling

The court dismissed the case with prejudice. It directed the Clerk to enter judgment and close the file. The order did not make any further determination about the underlying civil-rights allegations.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.