Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 14, 2025

Firsov v. Airlines

Judge
Beth Freeman
Docket
5:25-cv-03784
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Fee PetitionCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Sergey Firsov v. United Airlines, Judge Freeman denied Firsov’s motion for service-of-process fees because he did not show a proper waiver request.

Who this affects

The ruling affects Sergey Firsov’s request to recover service-of-process costs from United Airlines, Inc. and the other defendants.

What happened

In Sergey Firsov v. United Airlines, Inc, et al., Sergey Firsov asked the court to recover service costs under a federal rule governing requests to waive formal service. He claimed the defendants refused to return the waiver and sought $150 from each defendant.

The defendants opposed the motion, arguing that Firsov had delivered the summons only to a manager or ticket agents at San Francisco International Airport, rather than to an authorized agent. A United operations manager also stated that the documents were left on a counter after the person attempting delivery was told to contact United’s corporate office.

The court denied the motion because Firsov did not show that he made a proper request for waiver of service to an authorized recipient. Judge Beth Labson Freeman issued the order on October 14, 2025.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Firsov v. Airlines · No. 5:25-cv-03784
Judge
Beth Freeman
Date
Oct. 14, 2025

Background

Sergey Firsov moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d)(2) to recover costs for serving the defendants. He alleged that the defendants refused to cooperate and return a waiver of service and stated that he incurred $150 in service costs for each defendant. The defendants opposed the motion.

Legal standard

Rule 4(d)(1) requires a corporation subject to service under the applicable service rules to avoid unnecessary expenses of serving a summons. A request for waiver must be directed to an officer, managing or general agent, or another agent authorized by appointment or law to receive service. Under Rule 4(d)(2), if a defendant fails to waive service without good cause after receiving a valid request, the court must impose the expenses later incurred in making service.

Court’s analysis

The court concluded that Firsov’s moving papers showed, at most, an attempt to serve a branch or station manager who did not qualify as an officer, general manager, or authorized agent for service. Firsov provided no evidence showing otherwise. The court therefore found that he had not demonstrated that he made a proper request for waiver of service, which was required for recovering costs and fees under Rule 4(d)(2).

The opinion also discussed a declaration from Donald Walker, an operations manager employed by United Airlines. Walker stated that an unidentified individual attempted to hand legal documents to ticket agents, was told that the documents could not be accepted and to contact United’s corporate office, and then left the documents on the counter and walked away.

Disposition

The court denied Firsov’s motion for service-of-process fees.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.