Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 31, 2025

Ramirez v. Cafe Royale Restaurant Inc.

Judge
Rearden
Docket
1:22-cv-09684
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
EmploymentFlsaCivil ProcedureFee Petition
In one sentence

In Victor Ramirez v. Cafe Royale, Judge Rearden awarded Ramirez $440,675.50 plus interest after adopting a damages recommendation following Defendants’ default.

Who this affects

Victor Ramirez received the monetary award. Cafe Royale Restaurant Inc., Ramon Cuaya, and Jerry Cuaya were ordered to pay the award and applicable interest.

What happened

Victor Ramirez sued Cafe Royale Restaurant Inc., Ramon Cuaya, and Jerry Cuaya under federal and New York wage laws. The Defendants did not answer, appear, or oppose Ramirez’s request for a default judgment, which the Court entered in March 2024.

A magistrate judge recommended awarding Ramirez $440,675.50 for unpaid wages, overtime, spread-of-hours premiums, liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. The recommendation also included 9% pre-judgment interest on $214,726.00 and post-judgment interest at the statutory rate. No party objected.

Judge Rearden found no clear error and adopted the recommendation in full. The Court awarded Ramirez the stated $440,675.50, ordered the interest described above, and directed the Clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ramirez v. Cafe Royale Restaurant Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-09684
Judge
Rearden
Date
Aug. 31, 2025

Background

Victor Ramirez brought claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law. The defendants were Cafe Royale Restaurant Inc., Ramon Cuaya, and Jerry Cuaya. After the defendants were served, they did not answer or otherwise appear. The Clerk issued certificates of default, and Ramirez moved for a default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55.

On March 8, 2024, the Court entered a default judgment and referred the case to Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron to determine damages. Ramirez submitted proposed findings and supporting affidavits. Judge Aaron issued a Report and Recommendation on April 23, 2024. The recommendation stated that the parties had 14 days to object and warned that failing to object would waive objections and preclude appellate review. No objections were filed.

Recommended damages

Judge Aaron recommended awarding Ramirez:

- $16,240.00 in unpaid minimum wages; - $176,928.00 in overtime wages; - $21,558.00 in unpaid spread-of-hours premiums; - $214,726.00 in liquidated damages under the New York Labor Law; - $10,640.00 in attorneys’ fees; and - $583.50 in costs.

These amounts totaled $440,675.50. The recommendation also called for 9% statutory pre-judgment interest on $214,726.00, beginning May 26, 2019, through entry of judgment. It further recommended post-judgment interest at the rate provided by federal law.

Court’s review and ruling

Because no party objected, the Court reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error, meaning a clear mistake apparent from the record. The Court stated that the defendants waived judicial review by failing to object after receiving the stated warning. The Court nevertheless reviewed the recommendation and found no clear error.

Judge Rearden adopted Judge Aaron’s Report and Recommendation in full. The Court awarded Ramirez $440,675.50 in actual and liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs; awarded pre-judgment interest on $214,726.00 at the statutory 9% rate; and awarded post-judgment interest at the rate prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 1961. The Clerk was directed to close the case after judgment was entered.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.