Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 2, 2025

Jaime v. Deputy of Health Toumi

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05875
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Luis Jaime v. Deputy of Health Toumi, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice because Jaime neither paid the filing fee nor submitted the required forms.

Who this affects

Luis Jaime's complaint was dismissed without prejudice because he did not submit the required fee-waiver application and prisoner authorization or pay the $405 filing fee.

What happened

In Luis Jaime v. Deputy of Health Toumi, the court had ordered Luis Jaime to submit a fee-waiver application and prisoner authorization or pay the $405 filing fee within 30 days.

Jaime did not submit the required forms or pay the fee. The court therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice, meaning the dismissal did not bar refiling.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for any appeal. She directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jaime v. Deputy of Health Toumi · No. 1:25-cv-05875
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 2, 2025

Background

On July 25, 2025, the court ordered Luis Jaime to do one of two things within 30 days: submit a completed application to proceed without paying court fees, along with prisoner authorization, or pay the $405 required filing fee. The order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint.

Ruling

The court found that Jaime had not submitted the fee-waiver application and prisoner authorization and had not paid the filing fee. It dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915.

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for purposes of an appeal. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.