Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Aug. 29, 2025

Lawrence v. DA District Attorney Eric Gonzalez

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05131
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Lawrence v. Gonzalez, Judge Swain transferred Lawrence’s constitutional lawsuit from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District because Brooklyn was the apparent proper venue.

Who this affects

MyHope Lawrence’s case was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The receiving court will decide whether Lawrence may proceed without prepaying fees; the opinion does not resolve the constitutional claims against Eric Gonzalez, Elizabeth N. Warin, or Craig Newman.

What happened

In MyHope Lawrence v. DA District Attorney Eric Gonzalez, et al., MyHope Lawrence, representing himself, sued Kings County District Attorney Eric Gonzalez, Acting Justice Elizabeth N. Warin, and attorney Craig Newman over alleged federal constitutional violations. Lawrence appears to seek an injunction and possibly money damages.

The court found that Lawrence did not identify where the defendants lived, making venue in the Southern District of New York uncertain. But Lawrence appeared to allege that most or all of the events happened in Brooklyn, in Kings County, which is in the Eastern District of New York. The court therefore found that the Eastern District was a proper and more convenient venue.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the case transferred to the Eastern District of New York under the federal venue-transfer law. The Southern District closed the case there, issued no summonses, and left any decision about allowing Lawrence to proceed without paying fees to the receiving court. The court also denied fee-free status for an appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lawrence v. DA District Attorney Eric Gonzalez · No. 1:25-cv-05131
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Aug. 29, 2025

Background

MyHope Lawrence brought this action without a lawyer and asserted federal constitutional claims against Kings County District Attorney Eric Gonzalez, Acting Justice Elizabeth N. Warin of the New York Supreme Court, Kings County, and attorney Craig Newman. Lawrence is currently held in the George R. Vierno Center on Rikers Island. The opinion states that the claims seem principally to arise from events in the New York Supreme Court, Kings County, and that Lawrence appears to seek injunctive relief and perhaps damages.

Venue Analysis

Venue means the federal district where a case may properly be litigated. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), venue may be proper where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction. Lawrence did not state where the defendants reside, so the court could not determine whether venue was proper in the Southern District of New York on that basis.

The court noted, however, that Lawrence appeared to allege that a substantial part, if not all, of the relevant events occurred in Brooklyn, Kings County. Brooklyn is within the Eastern District of New York. Lawrence did not appear to allege that a substantial part of the events occurred in the Southern District. The court therefore concluded that the Eastern District was a proper venue based on where the events occurred.

Transfer Decision

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), a federal court may transfer a civil action to another federal district where it could have been brought when the transfer would serve the convenience of the parties and witnesses and the interests of justice. The court considered the apparent location of the events and reasoned that relevant documents and witnesses would likely also be located in the Eastern District. It determined that the Eastern District appeared to be the more convenient forum.

Disposition

The court directed the Clerk of Court to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. It stated that the case was closed in the Southern District of New York, that summonses would not issue from that court, and that the transferee court would decide whether Lawrence could proceed without prepaying fees. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for purposes of an appeal. The court did not decide the merits of Lawrence’s constitutional claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.