Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 8, 2025

Payton v. Total by Verizon

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05880
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Jonathan Payton v. Total by Verizon, Judge Swain ordered Payton to sign his amended fee application within 30 days or face dismissal without prejudice.

Who this affects

Jonathan Payton and the pending action against Total by Verizon and Verizon Inc.; the order requires Payton to sign the amended fee application before the case proceeds.

What happened

Jonathan Payton sued Total by Verizon and Verizon Inc. without a lawyer. The court said his amended application to proceed without paying filing fees was unsigned.

The court ordered Payton to sign and submit the application’s signature page within 30 days. No summons or answer will issue while he does so.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain said the case will be processed if Payton complies, but the action will be dismissed without prejudice if he does not. She also denied fee-free status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Payton v. Total by Verizon · No. 1:25-cv-05880
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Sept. 8, 2025

Background

Jonathan Payton brought the action without a lawyer. He submitted an amended application to proceed without paying the filing fee, but the court stated that the application was unsigned. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a) requires an unrepresented party to sign pleadings, motions, and other papers personally.

Order

The court directed Payton to sign and submit the attached signature page of the amended fee application within 30 days of the order. The court directed that no summons or answer issue at this time. If Payton complies, the case will be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If he does not comply within the allowed time, the action will be dismissed without prejudice, meaning the order does not state that refiling is barred.

The court certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied Payton permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal.

Judge

Judge Laura Taylor Swain issued the order on September 8, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.