Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Substantive rulingFiled Sept. 15, 2025

Commissioner of Social Security v. Plaintiff

Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Docket
1:25-cv-01005
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Plaintiff v. Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Gorenstein reversed the decision and remanded for a hearing and new decision.

Who this affects

The Plaintiff and the Commissioner of Social Security; the case returns to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings, including an opportunity for a hearing and a new decision.

What happened

In Plaintiff v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court entered judgment based on a stipulation and order dated September 12, 2025.

The judgment does not explain the specific reasons for the reversal. It states that the Commissioner’s decision was reversed and that the case would return for further administrative proceedings, including an opportunity for a hearing and a new decision.

Judge Gorenstein presided over the case, which was remanded under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Commissioner of Social Security v. Plaintiff · No. 1:25-cv-01005
Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Date
Sept. 15, 2025

Background

The opinion is a judgment in a Social Security case. It states that the judgment was entered for the reasons given in a stipulation and order dated September 12, 2025. That stipulation and order is not included in the provided text, so the specific dispute and reasons for the ruling are unclear.

Ruling

The court reversed the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision and remanded the action to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Those proceedings must include an opportunity for a hearing and a new decision. The judgment cites the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the provision authorizing this type of remand.

Effect

The provided judgment sends the matter back to the Social Security Administration for additional proceedings and a new decision. It does not state what that new decision must be or identify the specific errors in the Commissioner’s earlier decision.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.