Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 20, 2025

INC eS FRUITS & VEGETABLES v. NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC.

Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Docket
5:24-cv-07574
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In INC eS FRUITS & VEGETABLES v. NUTRIEN, Judge Cousins dismissed the settled case with prejudice and administratively closed it.

Who this affects

INC eS FRUITS & VEGETABLES and NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC.; the action and all asserted claims were dismissed with prejudice.

What happened

INC eS FRUITS & VEGETABLES sued NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC.; the opinion says the court was notified that the parties had settled, but does not describe the claims.

The court found that no issue remained for it to decide and dismissed the action and all claims with prejudice. The clerk was directed to administratively close the case, and scheduled dates were vacated.

Judge Nathanael Cousins stated that the court would retain jurisdiction for 30 days. A party may move to reopen the case during that period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
INC eS FRUITS & VEGETABLES v. NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC. · No. 5:24-cv-07574
Judge
Nathanael Cousins
Date
Nov. 20, 2025

Background

The court was notified that the action had settled. The opinion does not describe the parties’ underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Ruling

The court concluded that no issue remained for its determination. It ordered that the action and all claims asserted in it be dismissed with prejudice, meaning they may not be brought again in this case. The clerk was directed to administratively close the case, and all scheduled dates were vacated.

The court retained jurisdiction for 30 days. During that period, any party may move to reopen the case, provided the motion is filed within 30 days.

Effect

The case was dismissed with prejudice and administratively closed based on the reported settlement. The opinion does not state whether the court approved or enforced any particular settlement term.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.