Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 21, 2025

Aguilera v. Albarran

Judge
Pitts
Docket
5:25-cv-10086
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
HabeasImmigrationCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Wilson Omar Paz Aguilera v. Sergio Albarran, Judge Pitts transferred the petition challenging immigration detention to the Eastern District of California.

Who this affects

Wilson Omar Paz Aguilera's detention challenge was transferred from the Northern District of California to the Eastern District of California; the court did not decide the challenge's merits.

What happened

Wilson Omar Paz Aguilera filed this case without a lawyer while detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at the California City Detention Facility in Kern County. He challenged his detention under a federal law allowing courts to review detention.

Because the facility is in the Eastern District of California, the court transferred the case there. The court did not decide whether the detention was lawful.

Judge P. Casey Pitts ordered the transfer on November 21, 2025, under federal venue and detention-review statutes.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Aguilera v. Albarran · No. 5:25-cv-10086
Judge
Pitts
Date
Nov. 21, 2025

Background

Wilson Omar Paz Aguilera filed this case without a lawyer as an immigration detainee under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, a federal law that permits courts to review certain detention claims. He challenged his detention by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement at the California City Detention Facility in Kern County. The petition was filed while he was detained there.

Ruling

The court transferred the action to the Eastern District of California because the detention facility is located in that district. The order cited 28 U.S.C. §§ 1406(a) and 2241(a), along with a Ninth Circuit decision. The court did not reach the merits of the detention challenge.

Disposition

Judge P. Casey Pitts ordered the transfer on November 21, 2025. The opinion does not state any additional ruling on the petition.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.