Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 23, 2025

Perdue v. N.V.

Judge
James Oetken
Docket
1:16-cv-08000
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureSecurities
In one sentence

In Landon W. Perdue v. Mylan N.V., Judge Oetken directed the Clerk to close the already-resolved case.

Who this affects

Landon W. Perdue, Mylan N.V., the other defendants, and the Clerk of Court are affected by the direction to close the case.

What happened

Landon W. Perdue v. Mylan N.V. was consolidated with another case as part of a larger securities lawsuit. The consolidated case was resolved on March 30, 2023, and that decision was later upheld on appeal.

Because the consolidated case had been resolved, the court directed the Clerk of Court to close Perdue’s case.

Judge J. Paul Oetken issued the order on September 23, 2025. The order did not decide any new legal issue or describe further relief for the parties.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perdue v. N.V. · No. 1:16-cv-08000
Judge
James Oetken
Date
Sept. 23, 2025

Background

On January 9, 2017, the court consolidated this case with another proceeding as part of In re Mylan N.V. Securities Litigation. The consolidated case was resolved on March 30, 2023, and the decision was affirmed on appeal.

Ruling

Judge J. Paul Oetken directed the Clerk of Court to close this case. The order did not address the merits of any new claim or motion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.