Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 26, 2025

Michaels v. United States Patent and Trademark Office

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:25-cv-07019
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

Scott Michaels v. United States Patent and Trademark Office: Magistrate Judge Aaron ordered service after Michaels was allowed to proceed without prepaid fees.

Who this affects

Scott Michaels, the USPTO, and the USPTO director in her official capacity; the order directs the Clerk of Court and the U.S. Marshals Service regarding service.

What happened

Scott Michaels v. United States Patent and Trademark Office concerns Michaels’s federal-law case against the Patent and Trademark Office and its director in her official capacity. He is a British citizen representing himself.

Michaels had already received permission to proceed without paying court fees in advance. Because of that permission, the court said he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants.

Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron ordered the Clerk of Court to issue a summons and provide the Marshals Service with the paperwork needed to serve the United States. The order also replaced Kathi Vidal with current USPTO director John A. Squires and extended the service deadline until 90 days after summonses issue.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Michaels v. United States Patent and Trademark Office · No. 1:25-cv-07019
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Sept. 26, 2025

Background

Scott Michaels brings federal-law claims against the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and Kathi Vidal, in her official capacity as USPTO director. The opinion states that Michaels is a British citizen and is representing himself. Chief District Judge Swain had previously granted Michaels permission to proceed without paying court fees in advance.

Service of Process

Because Michaels was permitted to proceed without paying fees in advance, the court explained that he could rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court also noted that the usual 90-day deadline for serving a summons could not begin in the ordinary way because Michaels could not arrange service until the court reviewed the complaint and ordered the summonses issued. The court extended the service deadline until 90 days after any summonses issue.

Order

The Clerk of Court was instructed to mark the United States-service box on the required service form, issue a summons, and deliver to the Marshals Service a copy of the order and other paperwork needed to serve the United States. The order lists service addresses for the USPTO’s Office of the General Counsel, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York, and the Attorney General of the United States. The court also substituted current USPTO director John A. Squires for Kathi Vidal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d) and asked the Clerk to update the docket caption. Judge Stewart D. Aaron further advised Michaels that he could elect to receive court documents by email and directed that an information package be mailed to him.

What the Order Did Not Decide

This order addressed permission-based service and docket administration. It did not decide the merits of Michaels’s federal-law claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.