Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 8, 2025

Tamicko D. Murray McIver v. Search for Change Mental Health Housing, ET AL.

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-01542
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Tamicko D. Murray McIver v. Search for Change Mental Health Housing, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Tamicko D. Murray McIver and the named defendants are affected by the dismissal. The plaintiff is also affected by the denial of permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

What happened

Tamicko D. Murray McIver sued Search for Change Mental Health Housing and other defendants in the Southern District of New York. The judgment says the action was dismissed for the reasons given in an October 6, 2025 order, which is not included here.

The court also found that any appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied the plaintiff permission to appeal without paying filing fees.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the civil judgment on October 8, 2025. The judgment does not state the underlying reason for dismissing the action.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Tamicko D. Murray McIver v. Search for Change Mental Health Housing, ET AL. · No. 1:25-cv-01542
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 8, 2025

Ruling

The court dismissed the action, relying on the reasons stated in an October 6, 2025 order. That earlier order is not part of the supplied opinion, so the basis for dismissal cannot be determined from this text alone.

Appeal and Filing Fees

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied the plaintiff permission to appeal without paying filing fees. The judgment cites Coppedge v. United States for the principle that good faith exists when an appellant seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue.

Disposition

The action was dismissed. Permission to proceed without paying filing fees for an appeal was denied.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.