Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 8, 2025

Coleman v. Doe

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-04514
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Nail Coleman v. Doe, Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied permission to appeal without prepaying filing fees.

Who this affects

Nail Coleman, whose action was dismissed and whose permission to appeal without prepaying filing fees was denied. The judgment names Doe as the defendant.

What happened

Nail Coleman v. Doe is a case in which the court entered judgment dismissing the action. The judgment says the reasons were provided in an October 6, 2025, order, which is not included here.

The court also said any appeal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Nail Coleman permission to appeal without prepaying filing fees.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the October 8, 2025, judgment. The provided judgment does not explain the basis for dismissing the action.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Coleman v. Doe · No. 1:25-cv-04514
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 8, 2025

Disposition

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action “for the reasons stated” in an October 6, 2025, order. That earlier order is not included in the provided opinion, so the basis for dismissal cannot be determined from this text.

Appeal Filing Status

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that an appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The court therefore denied permission to appeal without prepaying filing fees. The judgment cites a Supreme Court decision explaining that good faith exists when an appellant seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue.

Judge

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on October 8, 2025, in New York, New York.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.