Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 9, 2025

Crane v. Commissioner Anthony Annucci

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-06912
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Crane v. Annucci, Judge Swain ordered a $350 check returned and denied fee-free appeal status.

Who this affects

Michael A. Crane, whose $350 check was ordered returned and whose permission to appeal without paying court fees was denied; the Finance Department, which was directed to return the check.

What happened

In Crane v. Annucci, the court said it had already dismissed Michael A. Crane’s action for failure to state a claim and that the case was closed.

The Finance Department received a $350 check from Crane on October 9, 2025. Because the case was closed, the court ordered the department to return the check to him.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied Crane permission to appeal without paying court fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Crane v. Commissioner Anthony Annucci · No. 1:23-cv-06912
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 9, 2025

Background

The court stated that it had dismissed Michael A. Crane’s action for failure to state a claim in an order dated January 16, 2024. The court further stated that the action was closed. A footnote said that Crane had initiated the action with 29 other individuals, who were incarcerated at Sing Sing Correctional Facility when they filed the complaint.

Check

On October 9, 2025, the Finance Department received a $350 check from Crane. Because the action was closed, the court directed the Finance Department to return the check to him.

Appeal-related ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Crane permission to proceed with an appeal without paying the required court fees. This order did not revisit the earlier dismissal or decide the merits of the underlying claims.

Disposition

The court ordered the $350 check returned and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.