Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 10, 2025

Perez v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

Full caption

Victor Manuel Perez Perez v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05553
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Perez Perez v. USCIS, Judge Swain dismissed the action without prejudice because Perez Perez neither paid the filing fee nor submitted an application to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Victor Manuel Perez Perez’s action was dismissed without prejudice. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services remained the named defendant, but the court did not decide the underlying claims.

What happened

Victor Manuel Perez Perez sued United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. The court had ordered him to submit an application to proceed without paying filing fees or to pay the required $405 fee within 30 days.

Perez Perez did neither. He submitted an opposition asking the court to reconsider its earlier order, grant him permission to proceed without prepaying the fee, or extend the deadline. He provided no information about his financial situation.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the action without prejudice and denied all requests in Perez Perez’s opposition. The court also denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal and directed the clerk to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Perez v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services · No. 1:25-cv-05553
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 10, 2025

Background

The court had previously ordered Victor Manuel Perez Perez, within 30 days, either to submit a completed application to proceed without prepaying filing fees or to pay the $405 required to file a civil action. The earlier order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal.

Plaintiff’s Submission

Perez Perez did not submit the required application or pay the filing fee. He filed a submission titled “Opposition to Judge’s Order,” asking the court to reconsider the earlier order, grant his request to proceed without prepaying fees, or extend the deadline. He stated that his financial situation made the filing fee a significant burden, but he provided no information about his finances or why he could not pay.

Ruling

The court denied all of Perez Perez’s requests in his opposition and dismissed the action without prejudice because he had neither submitted the application nor paid the filing fee. The court directed the clerk to enter judgment dismissing the action. It also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal.

Classification

This is a procedural order because the court dismissed the action for failure to satisfy filing-fee or fee-waiver requirements without addressing the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.