Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 20, 2025

Gonzalez v. Ryan Health Nena

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-06917
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Sierra Gonzalez v. Ryan Health Nena, Judge Swain dismissed the action under her August 11 order and certified any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Who this affects

Sierra Gonzalez’s action against Ryan Health Nena, Letitia James, and Jonathan Fried was dismissed. The court also certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith.

What happened

Sierra Gonzalez sued Ryan Health Nena, Letitia James, and Jonathan Fried. This judgment does not describe the claims or the reasons for the lawsuit; it refers to the court’s August 11, 2025, order for those reasons.

The court dismissed the action. It also certified under federal law that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith.

Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on October 20, 2025. The opinion provided does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gonzalez v. Ryan Health Nena · No. 1:24-cv-06917
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 20, 2025

Ruling

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing Sierra Gonzalez’s action against Ryan Health Nena, Letitia James, and Jonathan Fried. The judgment states that the dismissal was entered “[f]or the reasons stated in the August 11, 2025, order.” The August 11 order is not included in the provided opinion text, so the judgment itself does not explain the claims, the basis for dismissal, or whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the judgment on October 20, 2025.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.