Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 22, 2025

Flores v. Department of Homeless Services

Full caption

Constance Flores v. Department of Homeless Services; Neighborhood Association of Inter-Cultural Affairs; Casa de Carino

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:24-cv-06673
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Constance Flores v. Department of Homeless Services, Judge Stanton dismissed the action for reasons stated in an earlier order.

Who this affects

Constance Flores and the three named defendants: the Department of Homeless Services, Neighborhood Association of Inter-Cultural Affairs, and Casa de Carino.

What happened

In Constance Flores v. Department of Homeless Services, the court dismissed Constance Flores’s action against the Department of Homeless Services, Neighborhood Association of Inter-Cultural Affairs, and Casa de Carino. The judgment does not explain the underlying reasons.

The court said those reasons were stated in its September 16, 2025, order, which is not included in the provided text. The court also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith.

Judge Louis L. Stanton entered the civil judgment on October 22, 2025. The provided judgment does not state whether the dismissal permits or bars refiling.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Flores v. Department of Homeless Services · No. 1:24-cv-06673
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 22, 2025

Ruling

The court dismissed the action. It stated that the reasons for dismissal were explained in its September 16, 2025, order, but that earlier order is not part of the provided opinion text. Accordingly, the available text does not identify the claims, arguments, or legal grounds supporting the dismissal.

Appeal certification

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. The judgment does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.