Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 23, 2025

Payton v. Total by Verizon

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05880
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Jonathan Payton v. Total by Verizon, Chief Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Payton failed to submit a required original signature.

Who this affects

Jonathan Payton’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice; Total by Verizon and Verizon were no longer required to respond in this action unless it was refiled.

What happened

Jonathan Payton sued Total by Verizon and Verizon. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims.

The court had ordered Payton to resubmit the signature page of his application to proceed without paying court fees, using an original signature. The order warned that failing to do so within 30 days would result in dismissal.

Payton did not submit the signed page, so Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice. The court also denied fee-free status for any appeal and certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Payton v. Total by Verizon · No. 1:25-cv-05880
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Oct. 23, 2025

Background

The court had previously directed Jonathan Payton to resubmit the signature page of his application to proceed without paying the filing fee. The court required an original signature and gave him 30 days to comply. It warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint.

Court’s Ruling

Payton did not submit the signed signature page. Chief United States District Judge Laura Taylor Swain therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a). The order does not address the merits of Payton’s claims against Total by Verizon or Verizon.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Payton permission to proceed without paying fees for purposes of an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.