Price v. YesCare
- Laura Swain
- 1:25-cv-03244
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Nicholas J. Price v. YesCare, Judge Swain dismissed this duplicative lawsuit without prejudice to an earlier related case and ordered no filing fee charged.
Nicholas J. Price is affected because this case was dismissed, no filing fee was charged for it, and fee-waiver status was denied for an appeal. YesCare is the named defendant, and the earlier related litigation may continue.
What happened
Nicholas J. Price, who is incarcerated, filed this lawsuit without a lawyer against YesCare. He alleged that medical records were falsified and that he was denied adequate medical treatment.
The court said the lawsuit overlapped with an earlier related case and ordered Price to explain why this case should not be dismissed. Price did not respond or otherwise contact the court.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed this case without prejudice to the continuing earlier case. She ordered that Price not be charged the filing fee for this lawsuit, denied fee-waiver status for any appeal, and directed the clerk to enter judgment.
The detailed version
- Price v. YesCare · No. 1:25-cv-03244
- Laura Swain
- Oct. 27, 2025
Background
Nicholas J. Price, who is incarcerated at the Orange County Jail, filed this complaint without a lawyer and applied to proceed without paying the filing fee. Invoking 42 U.S.C. § 1983, he alleged that YesCare falsified his medical records and denied him adequate medical treatment.
The court identified an earlier related lawsuit, Price v. YesCare, No. 25-CV-1024 (LTS), involving the same and related events. In that earlier case, the court had allowed Price to file an amended complaint. The court concluded that the current lawsuit overlapped with claims in the earlier case and directed Price to show why this second lawsuit should not be dismissed. Price did not respond or otherwise communicate with the court.
Ruling
The court dismissed this complaint without prejudice to the continuing litigation in the earlier related case. It stated that Price could, consistent with the earlier order and Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, identify all defendants he sought to hold liable and assert all claims arising from the events in one action.
The court directed the clerk not to charge Price the $350 filing fee for this action. It also directed that funds not be deducted or encumbered from his prison trust account for this lawsuit. The court certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for purposes of an appeal. Finally, it directed the clerk to enter judgment dismissing the case.
Effect of the Order
The order ended this lawsuit, but the dismissal was without prejudice to the continuing litigation in the earlier related case. The opinion did not decide whether Price’s allegations about his medical records or medical treatment were legally valid.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.