Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 12, 2025

Nyambi v. Humboldt County Superior Court

Judge
Jacquelyn Corley
Docket
3:25-cv-03774
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Tita Nyambi v. Humboldt County Superior Court, Judge Corley ordered an address update and explanation by January 21, 2026, or dismissal may follow.

Who this affects

Tita Nyambi, the self-represented plaintiff, must provide a current mailing address and explain why the case should not be dismissed by January 21, 2026; otherwise, the case will be dismissed.

What happened

Tita Nyambi v. Humboldt County Superior Court is a civil-rights case filed by Nyambi without a lawyer. The court had previously dismissed the complaint while allowing an amended complaint and allowed Nyambi to proceed without paying filing fees.

Mail containing those orders was returned as undeliverable from two addresses provided by Nyambi. More than 60 days passed without Nyambi giving the court a current address, and Nyambi had not filed an amended complaint.

Judge Jacquelyn Corley ordered Nyambi to provide a valid mailing address and any necessary identification number by January 21, 2026, and to explain why the case should not be dismissed. The court said failure to comply will result in dismissal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Nyambi v. Humboldt County Superior Court · No. 3:25-cv-03774
Judge
Jacquelyn Corley
Date
Dec. 12, 2025

Background

Tita Nyambi filed this civil-rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 while proceeding without a lawyer. The court previously dismissed the complaint but allowed Nyambi to amend it, and granted permission to proceed without paying the filing fee. Nyambi has not filed an amended complaint.

The court mailed those orders to the inmate number and address Nyambi provided. The mail was returned as undeliverable. The Clerk later mailed the orders to another address Nyambi had provided for use after being released from custody, but that mail was also returned. More than 60 days had passed since the returned mail, and the court had not received a written communication providing a current address.

Applicable Rules

Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 3-11 requires a self-represented party whose address changes during a case to promptly file and serve a notice of the new address. The rule permits dismissal without prejudice when court mail is returned as undeliverable and the party does not provide a current address within 60 days.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) permits involuntary dismissal when a plaintiff fails to prosecute a case or comply with the rules or a court order. The court explained that dismissal under Rule 41(b) is appropriate only when the failure to comply is unreasonable. Nyambi had previously been ordered to keep the court informed of address changes and warned that failure to do so could lead to dismissal.

Order

The court ordered Nyambi, by January 21, 2026, to provide a current valid mailing address and any identification number needed to receive court mail. Nyambi must also show cause—provide a reason—why the case should not be dismissed under Civil Local Rule 3-11 or Rule 41(b).

The court did not dismiss the case in this order. It stated that failure to comply with the order will result in dismissal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.