Ryan v. Catsimatidis
- Vernon Broderick
- 1:24-cv-09422
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 4
In Maria Ryan v. John Catsimatidis, Judge Broderick ordered defendants to amend removal papers to allege WABC Radio, LLC members’ citizenship or face remand.
The order directly affects the removing defendants—Chad Lopez, John Catsimatidis, WABC Radio Foundation Inc., Red Apple Media Inc., and WABC Radio, LLC—by requiring them to amend the removal notice. It also affects Maria Ryan because the case could be remanded to New York state court if the defendants do not comply.
What happened
Maria Ryan sued John Catsimatidis and others in New York state court, and the defendants removed the case to federal court based on claimed diversity of citizenship. The defendants later filed a motion to dismiss, but Ryan did not initially file an opposition.
Before deciding whether Ryan could file a late opposition, the court reviewed whether federal jurisdiction had been properly shown. The court found that the removal notice did not identify the citizenship of each member of WABC Radio, LLC, which is required for determining an LLC’s citizenship.
Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered the defendants to file an amended removal notice within 14 days, correcting that defect. The court stated that if they missed the deadline, it would remand the case to New York state court without another order; the opinion did not decide the motion to dismiss.
The detailed version
- Ryan v. Catsimatidis · No. 1:24-cv-09422
- Vernon Broderick
- Nov. 4, 2025
Background
Maria Ryan filed this action in New York Supreme Court, New York County, on December 7, 2024. Chad Lopez, John Catsimatidis, WABC Radio Foundation Inc., Red Apple Media Inc., and WABC Radio, LLC removed the case to federal court on December 10, 2024. They asserted that the federal court had diversity jurisdiction, meaning jurisdiction over a case involving citizens of different states when the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.
The defendants alleged that Ryan was a citizen of New Hampshire; that Red Apple Media, Inc., WABC Radio Foundation Inc., and WABC Radio, LLC were New York corporations or entities with principal places of business in New York; and that Catsimatidis and Lopez were New York citizens. The notice of removal did not allege the citizenship of each member of WABC Radio, LLC.
The defendants also filed a motion to dismiss. After Ryan did not initially respond, the court ordered the defendants to serve her with the motion papers and set a deadline for her opposition. More than nine months after that deadline, Ryan’s counsel said that the opposition had been inadvertently omitted, and Ryan filed a request for more time. The defendants opposed that request and argued that their motion should remain unopposed.
Jurisdictional Defect
The court explained that the party removing a case bears the burden of establishing federal subject-matter jurisdiction. For a limited liability company, citizenship is determined by the citizenship of every member, not by the company’s place of incorporation or principal place of business. Because the defendants did not allege the citizenship of WABC Radio, LLC’s members, their stated basis for diversity jurisdiction was legally insufficient.
The court treated the defect as an incomplete statement of citizenship rather than a fundamental absence of diversity. It therefore allowed the defendants an opportunity to correct the removal notice instead of immediately remanding the case.
Order
Judge Vernon S. Broderick ordered the defendants to file an amended Notice of Removal within 14 days after the order was filed, curing the citizenship allegations concerning WABC Radio, LLC. The court stated that if the defendants did not meet that deadline, it would remand the case to the New York Supreme Court without further order. The order did not decide Ryan’s request for additional time or the defendants’ motion to dismiss.
Classification Basis
This is a procedural order because it addresses whether the federal court’s subject-matter jurisdiction was adequately established and does not decide the underlying claims or the pending motion to dismiss.
Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.