Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 4, 2025

Lewis v. State of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-03532
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

James D. Lewis v. State of New York: Judge Swain dismissed the action and denied permission to appeal without paying required fees.

Who this affects

James D. Lewis, whose action was dismissed and whose request to appeal without paying required filing fees was denied; the defendants, because the action was dismissed.

What happened

James D. Lewis v. State of New York was dismissed in a civil judgment dated November 4, 2025. The judgment says the reasons appear in a November 3 order, which is not included here.

The court also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Lewis permission to appeal without paying required fees. The supplied judgment does not describe the claims or explain the basis for dismissal.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain entered the judgment. The text provided does not state whether the dismissal reached the merits of the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lewis v. State of New York · No. 1:25-cv-03532
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Nov. 4, 2025

Ruling

The court entered a civil judgment dismissing the action. It stated that the reasons for dismissal were given in an order dated November 3, 2025. That earlier order is not included in the supplied opinion text.

Appeal-Fee Ruling

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the judgment would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied Lewis permission to appeal without paying the required filing fees. The judgment does not state whether the dismissal was with or without prejudice.

What the Opinion Does Not Say

The supplied judgment does not identify the claims, describe the parties’ arguments, or explain whether the dismissal was based on the merits, a pleading defect, jurisdiction, or another ground.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.