Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 23, 2025

Jiang v. KNTV Television LLC

Judge
Laurel Beeler
Docket
3:21-cv-01293
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Baiting Jiang v. KNTV, Judge Beeler referred the case to Judge Lin to decide whether it is related to another case.

Who this affects

The plaintiffs and defendants in Baiting Jiang, et al. v. KNTV Television LLC, et al.; the order determines which judge will first decide whether this case is related to another case.

What happened

Baiting Jiang, et al. v. KNTV Television LLC, et al. is a case in which the court addressed how the case should be assigned and coordinated with another case.

The court said an earlier dismissal of the entire case with prejudice was vacated by the Ninth Circuit because some unserved defendants had not consented to the magistrate judge’s authority. The court also said the related-case question should be considered before any reassignment.

Judge Laurel Beeler referred the case to United States District Judge Rita F. Lin to decide whether it is related to Qin v. KNTV Television LLC. If Judge Lin determines that the cases are not related, the case will be reassigned to a randomly selected district judge.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jiang v. KNTV Television LLC · No. 3:21-cv-01293
Judge
Laurel Beeler
Date
Dec. 23, 2025

Nature of the order

This order is a referral under Civil Local Rule 3-12(c). The court did not decide the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims. Instead, it referred the case to United States District Judge Rita F. Lin to determine whether this case is related to Qin v. KNTV Television LLC, No. 25-cv-00676-RFL.

Background

The court noted that the case has consent issues because unserved defendants appear on the docket without the court’s permission. Under the rule cited by the court, all parties, including unserved defendants, must consent to a magistrate judge’s authority to conduct the case.

The court also explained that it had previously dismissed the entire case with prejudice, addressing only the defendants it considered part of the operative complaint. The Ninth Circuit later vacated that dismissal and sent the case back because some unserved defendants had not consented to magistrate-judge jurisdiction.

Ruling

The court referred this case to Judge Rita F. Lin to determine whether it is related to the lower-numbered case, Qin v. KNTV Television LLC. The court stated that the related-case question would be addressed first. If the cases are found not to be related, the case will be reassigned to a randomly selected district judge. The order also states that the court separately filed a report and recommendation for dismissal in the lower-numbered case, but this order itself is a referral for determining the relationship between the cases.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.