Osorio v. J & A Zoi Inc.
Edgar Sibaja Osorio v. J & A Zoi Inc., doing business as Section 5 Pizza; Ionnis Kaitsas; and George Doe
- Katherine Failla
- 1:25-cv-06189
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Sibaja Osorio v. J & A Zoi Inc., Judge Failla required settlement papers and a fairness letter for review under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
The parties to the case, including Edgar Sibaja Osorio and the three named defendants, were required to submit settlement materials; pending motions and remaining dates were affected.
What happened
In Edgar Sibaja Osorio v. J & A Zoi Inc., the court was informed that the parties had reached a settlement in principle.
The court required the parties to file their completed settlement agreement and a joint letter addressing the settlement’s fairness by December 10, 2025. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms.
Judge Katherine Polk Failla directed the Clerk to terminate all pending motions and adjourn all remaining dates while the court reviews the settlement under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Second Circuit law.
The detailed version
- Osorio v. J & A Zoi Inc. · No. 1:25-cv-06189
- Katherine Failla
- Nov. 10, 2025
Background
On November 7, 2025, the court was informed that the parties had reached a settlement in principle. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms or describe the underlying claims beyond indicating that the court would review the agreement under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and Second Circuit law.
Order
The court instructed the parties to file their completed settlement agreement and a joint letter concerning the agreement’s fairness by December 10, 2025. The court cited the FLSA and Second Circuit law governing review of such settlements. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all pending motions and adjourn all remaining dates.
Disposition and Significance
This is a procedural order concerning review of a proposed settlement; it does not decide the merits of the parties’ claims. Judge Katherine Polk Failla did not state whether the settlement was approved.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.