Juan Jose Chapman Veloz v. Chestnut Holdings of New York, Inc.
- John Cronan
- 1:25-cv-03409
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Chapman Veloz v. Chestnut Holdings, Judge Cronan ordered the parties to prepare to discuss whether Plaintiff has standing.
Juan Jose Chapman Veloz and the defendants are affected because the parties must be prepared to discuss Plaintiff's standing at the scheduled pre-motion teleconference.
What happened
In Chapman Veloz v. Chestnut Holdings of New York, Inc., the court addressed preparations for a pre-motion conference scheduled for November 18, 2025.
The parties were told to be prepared to discuss whether Juan Jose Chapman Veloz has constitutional standing to bring claims under New York Labor Law provisions concerning wage notices and wage statements.
Judge Cronan did not decide whether Plaintiff has standing or rule on the claims; he issued an order adding that issue to the conference discussion.
The detailed version
- Juan Jose Chapman Veloz v. Chestnut Holdings of New York, Inc. · No. 1:25-cv-03409
- John Cronan
- Nov. 13, 2025
What the Order Did
The court directed the parties to be prepared to discuss an additional issue at a pre-motion teleconference scheduled for November 18, 2025, at 2:00 p.m.
Issue Identified
The issue is whether Plaintiff has Article III standing—the constitutional requirement that a person have a sufficient personal stake in a dispute—to bring claims under the New York Labor Law's wage-notice and wage-statement provisions, cited in the order as New York Labor Law § 195(1) and (3).
Disposition
The order did not decide whether Plaintiff has standing, resolve the cited claims, or grant or deny a motion. It directed the parties to be prepared to discuss the standing issue at the scheduled conference.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.