Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 19, 2025

Dinis v. New York City Department of Education

Full caption

Dinis Athanasios v. New York City Department of Education, Christina Koza, Principal of Spring Creek Community School

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:22-cv-07741
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Dinis Athanasios v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs.

Who this affects

Dinis Athanasios and the New York City Department of Education, Christina Koza, and the Principal of Spring Creek Community School. The case was closed based on a settlement, with no costs or attorneys’ fees awarded to either party.

What happened

Dinis Athanasios v. New York City Department of Education involved an agreement reached on all issues through the magistrate judge. The opinion does not describe the settlement’s terms.

The court canceled all scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, terminated all open motions, and closed the case. The parties may ask to reopen the case within 30 days by showing good cause.

Judge Valerie Caproni issued the order. The parties may also ask the court within 30 days to retain jurisdiction to enforce their settlement agreement, but they must submit the agreement and request such an order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Dinis v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:22-cv-07741
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Nov. 19, 2025

Background

The court was notified on November 18, 2025, that the parties had reached an agreement on all issues through the magistrate judge. The opinion does not state the settlement’s terms.

Court’s action

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

Possible reopening and enforcement

The parties may apply to reopen the case within 30 days of the order. Any such application must show good cause for keeping the case open despite the settlement. A request filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause may be denied on that basis.

If the parties want the court to retain jurisdiction—the authority to oversee enforcement—to enforce their settlement agreement, they must, within the same 30-day period, submit the settlement agreement under Rule 7.A of the court’s Individual Practices and ask the court to issue an order expressly retaining jurisdiction.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.