One2Six Creative Collective, LLC v. CultureCon LLC
- Valerie Caproni
- 1:25-cv-05672
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In One2Six Creative Collective v. CultureCon, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs, subject to limited reopening procedures.
One2Six Creative Collective, LLC and CultureCon LLC. The case was closed, and all scheduled conferences and deadlines were canceled. Either party may seek reopening within 30 days by showing good cause, and the parties may request that the court retain authority to enforce their settlement under the stated procedures.
What happened
One2Six Creative Collective, LLC v. CultureCon LLC was resolved after the court was told that the parties had reached an agreement on all issues through a magistrate judge. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
The court canceled all scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It directed the Clerk to terminate all open motions and close the case.
Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees. The parties may ask to reopen it within 30 days if they show good cause, and they may ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement by submitting the agreement and a separate request within that same period.
The detailed version
- One2Six Creative Collective, LLC v. CultureCon LLC · No. 1:25-cv-05672
- Valerie Caproni
- Nov. 30, 2025
Background
The court stated that, on November 25, 2025, it was notified that the parties had reached an agreement on all issues through a magistrate judge. The opinion does not provide the underlying claims, the settlement terms, or the magistrate judge’s name.
Court’s Action
Because the parties had reached a settlement, the court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate all open motions and close the case.
Ruling and Settlement Procedures
Judge Valerie Caproni ordered that the case be dismissed with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The parties may apply to reopen the case within 30 days, but the application must show good cause for keeping the case open despite the settlement. The court stated that an application filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause may be denied solely on that basis.
The court also explained that, if the parties want the court to retain jurisdiction—that is, authority—to enforce their settlement agreement, they must, within the same 30-day period, submit the settlement agreement under Rule 7.A of the court’s Individual Practices and request an order expressly retaining jurisdiction to enforce it.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.