Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 1, 2025

Izeh v. Department of Correction

Full caption

Matthew Izeh v. Department of Correction; The Warden Rikers Island/RNDC; Administration Officers Rikers Island Correction

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05656
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Matthew Izeh v. Department of Correction, Chief Judge Swain revoked Izeh’s filing-fee waiver and dismissed the complaint without prejudice under the three-strikes rule.

Who this affects

Matthew Izeh’s ability to proceed in this case and in future cases without paying filing fees while he remains in custody; the listed correctional defendants were not required to litigate the complaint on the merits in this order.

What happened

In Matthew Izeh v. Department of Correction, Matthew Izeh, who was incarcerated and representing himself, sued the listed correctional defendants. He had received permission to proceed without paying the filing fee, but the court later found that he had accumulated three qualifying dismissals under the Prison Litigation Reform Act.

The court ruled that Izeh could not proceed without paying the filing fee unless he showed that he faced an immediate danger of serious physical injury. The complaint alleged that he had slipped on pooled water near telephones on May 25, 2025, injuring his head, back, and elbow, but the court found that it did not show an immediate danger when the complaint was filed.

Chief Judge Swain vacated the earlier order allowing Izeh to proceed without paying the fee and dismissed the complaint without prejudice under the three-strikes rule. The court also denied permission to appeal without paying the fee, certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Izeh v. Department of Correction · No. 1:25-cv-05656
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Dec. 1, 2025

Background

Matthew Izeh, a prisoner at the Robert N. Davoren Center on Rikers Island, filed the action without a lawyer. The court had previously granted his application to proceed in forma pauperis, meaning without paying the filing fee.

The complaint alleged that on May 25, 2025, Izeh slipped and fell because water had pooled near the telephones, injuring his head, back, and elbow.

Three-Strikes Rule

The Prison Litigation Reform Act’s three-strikes provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), bars a prisoner from bringing a civil action without paying the filing fee when the prisoner has, on three or more prior occasions while incarcerated or detained, brought an action or appeal that was dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim. The exception applies when the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

The court found that Izeh had accumulated three qualifying strikes. It relied on a prior related proceeding, No. 25-CV-3975 (S.D.N.Y.), in which the court had determined, after giving Izeh notice and an opportunity to respond, that he was barred under § 1915(g). The court concluded that Izeh therefore could proceed only by paying the filing fee or alleging facts showing that he was in imminent danger of serious physical injury.

The court found that the alleged May 25 fall did not establish imminent danger at the time this complaint was filed. The opinion explains that a danger that had ended before filing was not enough to satisfy the exception.

Ruling

The court vacated its July 18, 2025 order granting Izeh permission to proceed without paying the filing fee and dismissed the complaint without prejudice under the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s three-strikes rule. The dismissal without prejudice means the order did not state that the complaint could never be brought again; the court’s footnote states that Izeh could start a new action by paying the filing fee. Any new complaint would still be subject to prisoner-complaint screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

The court also stated that Izeh remains barred from filing future actions without paying the filing fee while he is in custody unless he is under an imminent threat of serious physical injury. It certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying the fee. The Clerk of Court was directed to enter judgment dismissing the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.