Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 1, 2025

v. Film

Full caption

Juno (PKC), USA v. Constantin Film, USA, Germany; Highlight Communications AG; Switzerland; Unknown Unnamed Associates

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:25-cv-05120
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
10
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In JUNO (PKC), USA v. CONSTANTIN FILM, Judge Swain denied pseudonym use and granted the pro se plaintiff 30 days to amend and pay fees or seek a fee waiver.

Who this affects

The pro se plaintiff must disclose their real identifying information, amend the complaint, and either pay the stated fee or submit a properly identified fee-waiver application within 30 days. The case will be dismissed without prejudice if the plaintiff does not comply; no summons will issue yet.

What happened

JUNO (PKC), USA v. CONSTANTIN FILM involves a pro se plaintiff who filed under the name “Juno (PKC), USA” and sought permission to remain anonymous. The plaintiff alleged that defendants and others misappropriated creative works and personal medical information, and claimed that disclosure could cause harm.

The court ruled that the plaintiff’s vague allegations of retaliation and harm did not overcome the public’s interest in knowing the parties’ identities. It denied the pseudonym motion and gave the plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint using their real name, address, and signature, and either pay the stated $405 fee or submit a properly identified application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also stated that no summons would issue yet, denied the pending motions without prejudice, and warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal without prejudice. The court denied fee-waiver status for any appeal from this order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
v. Film · No. 1:25-cv-05120
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Dec. 1, 2025

Background

The plaintiff, proceeding without a lawyer, filed the action as “Juno (PKC), USA.” The plaintiff asserted that the court had federal-question and diversity jurisdiction and filed motions seeking to proceed under a pseudonym, obtain injunctive relief, compel a ruling, and present documentary evidence. The plaintiff alleged that defendants and “foreign investors and media producers” had misappropriated creative works and personal medical information since 2001. The plaintiff also alleged that disclosure of their identity could cause emotional distress or physical harm and that they had received anonymous threats and intimidation.

Pseudonym request

The court explained that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(a) generally requires a complaint to name all parties. Courts may allow anonymous litigation only in limited circumstances, applying factors that include the sensitivity of the issues, the risk and seriousness of harm from disclosure, vulnerability to that harm, prejudice to defendants, confidentiality to date, the public interest, and alternative ways to protect private information.

The court concluded that the plaintiff’s submissions did not justify anonymous litigation. The court described the allegations as appearing to involve an intellectual-property claim, but found the plaintiff’s references to personal medical information and fears of retaliation too vague to overcome the presumption that court filings are public. The court therefore denied the motion to proceed under a pseudonym. It stated that the plaintiff could later seek to redact sensitive information or ask the court to limit public access to particular documents.

Amended complaint and filing fees

The court granted the plaintiff 30 days’ leave to file an amended complaint bearing their real name, address, and signature. Within the same period, the plaintiff must either pay the $405 stated fee for bringing a civil action or submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees, using their real name, address, and signature. If the application is granted, the plaintiff may proceed without prepaying the fees.

Disposition

The court denied the motion to proceed under a pseudonym and granted 30 days’ leave to file the required amended complaint and fee payment or application. No summons will issue at this time. The pending motions were denied without prejudice. The court stated that failure to comply within the allowed period will result in dismissal without prejudice. It also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 10-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.