Sonia S. v. Bisignano
- Douglas Micko
- 0:25-cv-03095
- U.S. District Court · District of Minnesota
- 5
In Sonia S. v. Bisignano, Judge Micko granted the request for $12,358.70 in Equal Access to Justice Act attorney fees.
Sonia S. and her attorney, Thomas A. Krause, received authorization for the requested $12,358.70 fee award; the Commissioner’s request for a reduced award was rejected.
What happened
In Sonia S. v. Bisignano, Sonia S. asked for attorney fees after the court remanded her disability-benefits case to the Social Security Administration. Her lawyer requested $12,358.70 for 47.8 hours of work under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
The Commissioner opposed the full request and asked the court to award $9,281.74 instead. He argued that some tasks were clerical and that the time spent reviewing medical records and preparing the case was excessive. Sonia S.’s lawyer responded that the work was mostly legal, the hours were reasonable, and the case involved unfamiliar medical issues.
Judge Douglas L. Micko granted the motion and authorized payment of $12,358.70 to Thomas A. Krause. The court found the disputed tasks compensable and concluded that the total time was reasonable, including the time spent reviewing the medical records and drafting the brief.
The detailed version
- Sonia S. v. Bisignano · No. 0:25-cv-03095
- Douglas L. Micko
- May 13, 2026
Background
Sonia S. challenged the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision denying her disability benefits. The court remanded the matter to the Social Security Administration on February 6, 2026, consistent with the parties’ joint stipulation for remand. Sonia S.’s attorney, Thomas A. Krause, then moved for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), requesting $12,358.70 for 47.8 hours of work.
The Commissioner opposed the requested amount and asked the court to award $9,281.74. He argued that some of the billed tasks were clerical and therefore not compensable as attorney work. He also argued that the time spent reviewing the medical record and preparing Sonia S.’s brief was unreasonable.
Court’s Analysis
The court explained that the EAJA permits a prevailing party to recover reasonable attorney fees when the statutory requirements are met. Purely clerical work is not compensable as attorney fees. Krause conceded that 0.6 hours of billed time was clerical. The court nevertheless found that the descriptions of the other disputed tasks showed they were legal in nature and compensable under the EAJA. The court also noted that Krause had not requested payment for preparing the reply addressing the fee dispute.
The court rejected the Commissioner’s argument that the total number of hours was excessive. Although courts often award between 20 and 40 hours in Social Security cases, the court stated that this range is flexible and depends on the facts. It found that 47.8 hours was consistent with standards in the District of Minnesota and that 28.7 hours spent drafting the brief and 9.8 hours reviewing medical records were not unreasonable. The court considered the unfamiliar medical conditions involved in the case.
Disposition
The court GRANTED Sonia S.’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees. It authorized payment to Thomas A. Krause of $12,358.70 under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, for attorney fees for court-related services.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.