Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 17, 2026

Sound Around v. Friedman

Judge
Denise Cote
Docket
1:24-cv-01986
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
10

Counsel14 of record
PLAINTIFF
Holland & Knight LLPLLP5 attorneys
Annelise Del Rivero, Gabriel Godoy-Dalmau, Jesus Enrique Cuza
NOMINAL DEFENDANT
Peter Seiden Milber, Makris, Plousadis & Seiden, LLP (Woodbury)
CROSS DEFENDANT
Nicholas Joseph Fortuna Allyn & Fortuna LLP
Han Lin Rong Allyn & Fortuna LLP
Megan Jeane Muoio Allyn & Fortuna LLP
DEFENDANT
Nicholas Joseph Fortuna Allyn & Fortuna LLP
Han Lin Rong Allyn & Fortuna LLP
Megan Jeane Muoio Allyn & Fortuna LLP
Michael Joseph Byrne Byrne & O'Neill, LLP
Paul P. Novak Byrne & O'Neill, LLP

Counsel of record per CourtListener. Firm names are approximate and have been consolidated across spelling variants.

Fee PetitionDiscoveryCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Sound Around v. Moises Friedman, Judge Parker awarded $34,137 in fees after reducing Sound Around’s request for sanctions-related legal work.

Who this affects

Sound Around, Inc., which sought reimbursement for fees incurred in bringing its earlier sanctions motion; the order awarded it $34,137.

What happened

Sound Around, Inc. asked the court to reimburse $56,895 for legal work connected to an earlier motion for sanctions involving discovery. The request covered 69.5 hours billed by four partners and a paralegal.

The court found the partners’ hourly rates reasonable but found the paralegal’s $300 hourly rate unreasonable. It also found that the lawyers used unclear combined time entries and staffed a straightforward motion with too many senior lawyers.

Judge Katharine H. Parker applied a 40% reduction and awarded Sound Around $34,137 in attorneys’ fees under the court’s earlier sanctions order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Sound Around v. Friedman · No. 1:24-cv-01986
Judge
Denise Cote
Date
July 17, 2026

Background

The court had previously granted Sound Around’s motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37. Sound Around then applied for $56,895 in attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in bringing that sanctions motion. Its lawyers reported 69.5 hours of work by four partners and one paralegal, performed between January 24 and March 23, 2026.

Legal standard

The court explained that a reasonable fee is generally calculated by multiplying a reasonable hourly rate by the number of hours reasonably spent. The party seeking fees bears the burden of showing that the requested rates and hours are reasonable. Courts may reduce fees for excessive, redundant, unnecessary, or inadequately documented work.

Court’s analysis

The court found the hourly rates charged for the four partners reasonable because they were within or below rates generally approved in the Southern District of New York for experienced partners handling complex litigation. It reached a different conclusion for the paralegal’s $300 hourly rate, finding that rate unreasonable for the straightforward sanctions motion.

The court also found problems with the hours claimed. Some time entries combined multiple tasks into a single block of time, making it unclear how much time was spent on each task and whether some communications concerned the sanctions motion or other work. The court further found that the motion was overstaffed: no junior or mid-level associate performed the main drafting work, while three partners participated in multiple editing rounds. The court determined that this staffing was not reasonable for the motion.

Disposition

Judge Katharine H. Parker applied a 40% reduction to the requested fees. The reduction resulted in an award of $34,137 to Sound Around in attorneys’ fees pursuant to the court’s April 7, 2026 sanctions order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 10-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.