Cuddy Law Firm, P.L.L.C. v. New York City Department of Education
- Jesse Furman
- 1:25-cv-08515
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
Cuddy Law Firm v. New York City Department of Education: Judge Furman adopted a recommendation granting and denying in part the firm’s fee motion and closed the case.
Cuddy Law Firm, P.L.L.C. and the New York City Department of Education; the order resolves the firm’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs and closes the case.
What happened
Cuddy Law Firm, P.L.L.C. sued the New York City Department of Education to recover attorneys’ fees and costs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Ricardo for a recommendation.
The magistrate judge recommended that the firm’s motion for attorneys’ fees be granted and denied in part. Neither party objected or requested more time, so the court found that they had waived their right to object and adopted the recommendation in its entirety. The clerk was directed to close the case.
Judge Jesse M. Furman issued the order on July 17, 2026.
The detailed version
- Cuddy Law Firm, P.L.L.C. v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:25-cv-08515
- Jesse Furman
- July 17, 2026
Background
Cuddy Law Firm, P.L.L.C. brought an action seeking attorneys’ fees and costs under the fee-shifting provision of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Ricardo, who issued a Report and Recommendation on July 2, 2026.
Recommendation and Review
The Report and Recommendation recommended that Cuddy Law Firm’s motion for attorneys’ fees be granted and denied in part. The magistrate judge gave the parties fourteen days to object and warned that failing to object on time would waive the right to object. The report also referred the parties to the applicable federal rule and statute.
No objections or requests for an extension were filed. Judge Furman therefore held that the parties waived their right to object to the recommendation or obtain appellate review. Even so, he reviewed the petition and the Report and Recommendation and found it well reasoned and supported by the facts and law.
Ruling
Judge Jesse M. Furman adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The clerk was directed to terminate the listed docket entry and close the case.
Scope of the Order
The opinion states that the fee motion was recommended to be “granted and denied in part,” but it does not identify in this order which portions were granted or denied.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.