Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 1, 2026

Zhang v. United States Department of State

Judge
Van Keulen
Docket
5:26-cv-00562
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureImmigration
In one sentence

In Yuchen Zhang v. United States Department of State, Judge Van Keulen scheduled a hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss or transfer venue.

Who this affects

Yuchen Zhang, the defendants, and their counsel are affected because the court scheduled the hearing and required counsel to prepare answers to the identified venue questions.

What happened

In Yuchen Zhang v. United States Department of State, the defendants asked the court to dismiss the case or transfer it to another venue. The order does not describe the underlying claims or decide that motion.

The court scheduled an in-person hearing for September 24, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. It directed counsel to be prepared to address whether Zhang’s approved Form I-140 affects whether venue is proper in the Northern District of California and whether Zhang’s location outside the United States when the case was filed matters.

Judge Susan Van Keulen issued the order. The court did not grant or deny the motion to dismiss or transfer; it only set the hearing and identified questions for counsel.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Zhang v. United States Department of State · No. 5:26-cv-00562
Judge
Van Keulen
Date
Sept. 1, 2026

Order and procedural posture

The court set an in-person hearing on the defendants’ motion to dismiss or, alternatively, to transfer venue. The hearing is scheduled for September 24, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. The order does not rule on either requested disposition.

Questions for the hearing

The court noted that Zhang submitted evidence of an approved Form I-140. It directed counsel to address whether that approval has significance for deciding whether venue is proper in the Northern District of California. The court specifically asked whether the approved Form I-140 could show that Zhang took steps under the immigration laws that objectively manifest an intent to become a permanent resident of the United States and therefore could claim residency for purposes of establishing venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c)(1).

The court also directed counsel to address the significance, if any, of Zhang’s being located outside the United States when the action was filed.

Disposition

Judge Susan Van Keulen ordered the hearing and identified issues for counsel to address. The opinion does not state that the motion to dismiss or transfer was granted or denied.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.