Jr. v. Experian Information Solutions
Bobby L. Hughley Jr. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.; Equifax Information Services, LLC; TransUnion, LLC; Nelnet, Inc.; Kikoff Lending, LLC
- Vyskocil
- 1:25-cv-00861
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
Counsel of record per CourtListener. Firm names are approximate and have been consolidated across spelling variants.
In Bobby L. Hughley Jr. v. Kikoff Lending, Judge Vyskocil discontinued the case against Kikoff after a settlement in principle, subject to restoration by September 21.
Bobby L. Hughley Jr. and Kikoff Lending, LLC; the order terminates Kikoff Lending as a defendant and sets conditions for restoring the action against it.
What happened
Bobby L. Hughley Jr. sued Experian Information Solutions, Equifax Information Services, TransUnion, Nelnet, and Kikoff Lending. Kikoff Lending told the court that it had reached a settlement in principle with Hughley.
The court discontinued the action against Kikoff Lending without costs to any party. The order allows the action against Kikoff Lending to return to the court’s calendar if the parties cannot put their settlement in writing and an application is made by September 21, 2026.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered the Clerk of Court to terminate Kikoff Lending as a defendant. If no application to restore the action is made by September 21, 2026, the dismissal as to Kikoff Lending will be with prejudice.
The detailed version
- Jr. v. Experian Information Solutions · No. 1:25-cv-00861
- Vyskocil
- Aug. 20, 2026
Background
The court received a letter from Kikoff Lending, LLC stating that it had reached a settlement in principle with Plaintiff Bobby L. Hughley Jr.
Ruling
The court ordered that the action be discontinued as to Kikoff Lending without costs to any party. The order permits the action to be restored to the court’s calendar if Hughley and Kikoff Lending are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing, provided that an application to restore the action is made by September 21, 2026. If no such application is made by that date, the dismissal as to Kikoff Lending is with prejudice. The Clerk of Court was requested to terminate Kikoff Lending as a defendant. The order does not state a disposition as to the other defendants.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.