Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Sept. 27, 2019

Simmons v. Mischel

Judge
Virginia Demarchi
Docket
5:18-cv-02193
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureEvidence
In one sentence

In Simmons v. Mischel, Judge Demarchi granted defendants’ motion to seal medical records and ordered a corrected filing by October 4, 2019.

Who this affects

The order affects defendants’ filing of Attachment 11 and limits public access to Simmons’s medical records contained in that attachment.

What happened

In Simmons v. Mischel, defendants asked to seal an attachment to a declaration filed with their motion to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment. Joyce Simmons did not respond to the sealing request.

The court applied the stricter standard for sealing material related to the case’s merits. It found compelling reasons because the attachment contained Simmons’s medical records, including information unrelated to the injuries alleged in her complaint.

The court granted the motion to seal. Judge Demarchi also ordered defendants to file an unredacted version of the attachment under seal by October 4, 2019, because their filing did not comply with the court’s local rule.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Simmons v. Mischel · No. 5:18-cv-02193
Judge
Virginia Demarchi
Date
Sept. 27, 2019

Background

Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint or, alternatively, for summary judgment. In connection with that motion, they filed an administrative motion asking to seal Attachment 11 to the declaration of Jacquelyn Herrera under Civil Local Rule 79-5. Joyce Simmons did not respond to the motion to seal.

Sealing Standard

The court explained that judicial records accompanying dispositive motions generally carry a strong presumption of public access. That presumption can be overcome by “compelling reasons” supported by specific factual findings. Documents connected only indirectly to the merits may instead be sealed under the lower “good cause” standard.

Here, the court found that the attachment was related to the merits, so the compelling-reasons standard applied. The attachment contained Simmons’s medical records, including information unrelated to the injuries she alleged in her complaint. The court found that this was a compelling reason to seal the attachment.

Ruling

The court granted defendants’ administrative motion to file Attachment 11 under seal. It also found that defendants had not complied with Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)(1)(D), which required them to file an unredacted copy of the document with the sealing motion. Because defendants had provided only a physical copy to the court, Judge Virginia K. Demarchi ordered them to file the unredacted attachment under seal by October 4, 2019.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.