Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 3, 2019

Peace v. 850 Bryant Street

Judge
Susan Illston
Docket
3:19-cv-04691
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Peace v. 850 Bryant Street, Judge Illston extended the amended-complaint deadline but denied Peace’s request for appointed counsel.

Who this affects

Michael Peace’s filing deadline was extended, and his request for appointed counsel was denied; the court warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not file the amended complaint by January 10, 2020.

What happened

In Peace v. 850 Bryant Street, Michael Peace asked for more time to file an amended complaint and asked the court to appoint a lawyer for him.

The court granted the extension and set January 10, 2020, as the new filing deadline. It warned that failing to meet the deadline would result in dismissal of the action.

Judge Susan Illston denied the request for appointed counsel because Peace had not yet filed a pleading stating a claim or showing a likelihood of success on the merits.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Peace v. 850 Bryant Street · No. 3:19-cv-04691
Judge
Susan Illston
Date
Dec. 3, 2019

Background

Michael Peace asked for an extension of the deadline to file an amended complaint. In the same request, he asked the court to appoint counsel to represent him.

Extension of the Filing Deadline

The court granted Peace’s request for more time. It ordered him to file the amended complaint by January 10, 2020, and stated that failing to do so would result in dismissal of the action.

Request for Appointed Counsel

The court explained that, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), a district court may appoint counsel for an indigent civil litigant in exceptional circumstances. The court considers both the likelihood of success on the merits and the person’s ability to explain the claims without a lawyer, considering the complexity of the legal issues.

Judge Susan Illston found that exceptional circumstances were not present at that time because Peace had not yet submitted a pleading that stated a claim or suggested any likelihood of success on the merits. The court therefore denied Peace’s request for appointed counsel.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.