Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 18, 2019

Ashker v. Newsom

Judge
Claudia Wilken
Docket
4:09-cv-05796
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Ashker v. Newsom, Magistrate Judge Illman granted plaintiffs’ motion to seal information claimed to threaten prison safety and ongoing investigations.

Who this affects

The ruling affected the plaintiffs’ request to seal specified materials and the defendants’ asserted institutional-safety and investigation concerns. The sealed materials concerned an enforcement motion in this class action.

What happened

Ashker v. Newsom concerns plaintiffs’ request to keep certain documents and document portions confidential. The materials related to plaintiffs’ enforcement motion about an unauthorized prison offense designation.

Plaintiffs argued that the materials contained confidential information. Defendants claimed disclosure could harm institutional safety and security and compromise ongoing investigations of alleged prison gang activity. The court found that plaintiffs met the required good-cause standard for sealing.

The court granted plaintiffs’ administrative motion to file under seal. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman entered the order on December 18, 2019.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Ashker v. Newsom · No. 4:09-cv-05796
Judge
Claudia Wilken
Date
Dec. 18, 2019

Background

Plaintiffs filed an administrative motion asking the court to seal Exhibit A, portions of Exhibit B, and portions of the declaration supporting their enforcement motion regarding the unauthorized Security Housing Unit-eligible offense of “Participation in a Rout with an STG Nexus.” The opinion also refers to a supporting declaration from Carmen Bremer.

Court’s analysis

Under Civil Local Rule 79-5(a), the court required a showing that the information qualified for protection under the law. The court found that plaintiffs had met the “good cause” standard. The court accepted plaintiffs’ showing that the materials contained confidential information that defendants claimed could harm CDCR institutional safety and security if disclosed and could further compromise ongoing investigations of alleged prison gang activity.

Ruling

After considering the administrative motion and the supporting declaration, the court granted plaintiffs’ motion to file the specified materials under seal. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.