Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 3, 2020

Rodriguez v. Koenig

Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Docket
4:19-cv-01273
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Rodriguez v. Labahn, Judge Rogers dismissed without prejudice all claims against James Martin because he was not served.

Who this affects

Cesar A. Rodriguez and Deputy Commissioner James Martin; the ruling dismissed all claims against Martin without prejudice because he had not been served.

What happened

In Rodriguez v. Labahn, Cesar A. Rodriguez brought a lawsuit without a lawyer under a federal civil-rights law. The court had ordered that the defendants be served.

Deputy Commissioner James Martin had not been served. The court had given Rodriguez 28 days to provide information needed for service, but he did not provide it. Because more than 120 days had passed and Rodriguez did not show a reason for the delay, the court dismissed the claims against Martin without prejudice.

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued the order on March 3, 2020. The ruling concerned the claims against Martin and was based on the failure to complete service, not on the merits of those claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rodriguez v. Koenig · No. 4:19-cv-01273
Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Date
Mar. 3, 2020

Background

Cesar A. Rodriguez, identified as a former state prisoner, filed this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court had issued an order providing for service of the defendants. Deputy Commissioner James Martin had not been served.

Because Rodriguez was proceeding without paying the filing fee, the court stated that he was responsible for providing current addresses for the defendants so service could be completed. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), a complaint may be dismissed without prejudice when it is not served within 120 days. The court also explained that a self-represented litigant who is told about a service problem must try to correct it.

Court’s Reasoning

In an order dated January 3, 2020, the court informed Rodriguez that he needed to provide an address for Martin within 28 days. The 28-day period passed, but Rodriguez did not provide the required information. More than 120 days had passed since the action was filed, service on Martin had not been completed, and Rodriguez had not shown cause for the failure to serve him.

Ruling

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers dismissed all claims against James Martin without prejudice under Rule 4(m). The opinion does not decide the underlying merits of those claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.