Bolanos v. Jenkins
- William Orrick
- 3:20-cv-03825
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 5
In Bolanos v. Jenkins, Judge Orrick denied the compassionate-release request and dismissed the petition without prejudice because the claims belonged in other proceedings.
Gaylene L. Bolanos was required to pursue compassionate release in the Eastern District of California and to bring any prison-conditions claims in a civil-rights action after exhausting available Bureau of Prisons administrative remedies.
What happened
Bolanos v. Jenkins concerned Gaylene L. Bolanos’s request for release from FCI-Dublin because she believed her medical conditions and prison conditions put her at high risk from COVID-19. She filed the request under a federal law used to challenge unlawful custody.
The court said a compassionate-release request had to be filed in the court that sentenced Bolanos in the Eastern District of California. It also said her equal-protection and prison-conditions claims had to be brought in a civil-rights case rather than a custody-release petition.
Judge William H. Orrick denied the compassionate-release request and dismissed the federal custody petition without prejudice. The dismissal left Bolanos able to seek compassionate release in the sentencing court and file a civil-rights case after exhausting available Bureau of Prisons administrative remedies.
The detailed version
- Bolanos v. Jenkins · No. 3:20-cv-03825
- William Orrick
- June 16, 2020
Background
Gaylene L. Bolanos, a federal prisoner held at FCI-Dublin, sought release under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 because she believed her current confinement conditions exposed her to a high risk of contracting COVID-19. The opinion states that she was 63 years old and had various medical conditions, including a heart-valve defect and high blood pressure. She had been sentenced to 120 months in the Eastern District of California.
Claims and Analysis
Bolanos sought compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582, as well as relief based on the Equal Protection Clause and memoranda issued by Attorney General William Barr directing Bureau of Prisons officials to consider release or transfer for certain at-risk prisoners.
The court held that a compassionate-release request under § 3582 had to be presented to the sentencing court. The Northern District of California therefore could not decide that request through a § 2241 petition. The court stated that Bolanos’s request for compassionate release under § 3582 was DENIED and identified the Eastern District of California as the proper court for that request.
The court separately held that Bolanos’s equal-protection and prison-conditions claims were civil-rights claims, not claims properly brought through a petition challenging the legality of her custody. Those claims could be pursued in a federal civil-rights action. The court also explained that a federal prisoner must exhaust available administrative remedies with the Bureau of Prisons before filing such a prison-conditions action.
Disposition
The court DISMISSED without prejudice the federal habeas corpus action. The dismissal was without prejudice to Bolanos’s filing a compassionate-release request in the sentencing court and without prejudice to filing a civil-rights action after exhausting available administrative remedies. The Clerk was directed to enter judgment for the respondent and close the file. Judge William H. Orrick signed the order on June 16, 2020.
Read the full 5-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.