Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Substantive rulingFiled July 6, 2020

Greppi III v. Social Security

Judge
Thomas Hixson
Docket
3:18-cv-05576
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Social SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Greppi III v. Social Security, Judge Hixson remanded the case for further proceedings under a Ninth Circuit decision.

Who this affects

Raymond Greppi III and the Commissioner of Social Security.

What happened

In Greppi III v. Commissioner of Social Security, the court ordered that the case be sent back for further proceedings. The order does not describe the underlying Social Security dispute.

The court directed the further proceedings to follow the Ninth Circuit’s decision in a related case identified in the order. The order does not state what specific issues must be reconsidered.

Judge Thomas S. Hixson signed the July 6, 2020 order remanding the case. The order does not otherwise explain the reasons for the remand.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Greppi III v. Social Security · No. 3:18-cv-05576
Judge
Thomas Hixson
Date
July 6, 2020

Ruling

The court ordered that the case be remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the Ninth Circuit’s decision in a related proceeding identified as Greppi v. Saul, No. 19-16030, 2020 WL 3605946 (9th Cir. July 2, 2020).

The order does not describe the underlying claim, the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning, or the specific proceedings required on remand. It states only that the case is remanded in accordance with that decision.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.