Ellawendy v. Monterey County Superior Court
- Beth Freeman
- 5:20-cv-00869
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Ellawendy v. Monterey County Superior Court, Judge Freeman denied a certificate of appealability after dismissing Ellawendy’s petition for failing to exhaust state remedies.
Abdel Fatah Ellawendy, whose appeal could not proceed based on this order because the court denied a certificate of appealability.
What happened
In Ellawendy v. Monterey County Superior Court, Abdel Fatah Ellawendy challenged his conviction in a federal petition while representing himself. The court had dismissed the petition because he had not completed the required state-court review.
Ellawendy appealed, and the Ninth Circuit sent the case back only for the district court to decide whether he should receive a certificate of appealability—a document needed to pursue an appeal in this setting. The court noted that a later-filed petition showed he had eventually sought review by the state’s highest court, and said the matter would proceed under that later petition.
Judge Beth Labson Freeman denied a certificate of appealability. She concluded that reasonable judges would not debate whether the petition stated a valid constitutional claim or whether the court was correct to dismiss it for failure to exhaust state remedies.
The detailed version
- Ellawendy v. Monterey County Superior Court · No. 5:20-cv-00869
- Beth Freeman
- July 7, 2020
Background
Abdel Fatah Ellawendy, a state prisoner proceeding without a lawyer, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his conviction. On June 3, 2020, the court dismissed the action for failure to exhaust state judicial remedies, meaning that he had not completed the required state-court review before seeking federal relief.
The opinion states that this was Ellawendy’s second federal habeas petition filed in the district. When he filed it, he had appealed only to the state appellate court. A later-filed third habeas action indicated that he had subsequently sought review by the state’s highest court and had been denied relief. The court therefore stated that the matter would proceed under the more recently filed petition.
Appeal and ruling
Ellawendy appealed the dismissal. The Ninth Circuit remanded the matter for the limited purpose of deciding whether to grant or deny a certificate of appealability. A certificate of appealability is required to pursue an appeal from the denial of a federal habeas petition.
Judge Beth Labson Freeman denied a certificate of appealability. Applying the standard quoted from Slack v. McDaniel, the court found that reasonable judges would not debate whether the petition stated a valid constitutional claim or whether the district court correctly dismissed the petition on procedural grounds. The clerk was directed to send a copy of the order to the Ninth Circuit.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.