Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Nov. 6, 2020

Jones v. Newsom

Judge
Kandis Westmore
Docket
4:20-cv-07154
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureHabeasPro Se
In one sentence

In Jones v. Newsom, Judge Westmore transferred the case to California’s Eastern District because the alleged events occurred there.

Who this affects

Kevin Walker Jones’s case was transferred from the Northern District of California to the Eastern District of California; the order also directed the Clerk to terminate any pending motions.

What happened

Kevin Walker Jones, a state prisoner proceeding without a lawyer, filed a document challenging the involuntary administration of psychiatric medication at Kern Valley State Prison and a related administrative law judge’s order. The case is Jones v. Newsom.

The court said the filing might be a petition challenging custody or a civil-rights case. Either way, it concluded that the Eastern District of California was the proper venue because Kern Valley State Prison and the alleged events are in Kern County, and many defendants reside there.

Judge Kandis A. Westmore ordered the Clerk to terminate any pending motions and transfer the case to the Eastern District of California. The order did not decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Jones v. Newsom · No. 4:20-cv-07154
Judge
Kandis Westmore
Date
Nov. 6, 2020

Background

Kevin Walker Jones, a state prisoner housed at Kern Valley State Prison and proceeding without a lawyer, filed a document titled “Notice of Objection and Reconsideration Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.” The court said the filing appeared to allege claims against medical personnel at the prison concerning the involuntary administration of psychiatric medication. Jones also challenged a September 8, 2020 order by an administrative law judge authorizing that medication.

Venue analysis

The court said the action might be either a habeas case—a case challenging the legality of custody—or a civil-rights case. If it were a habeas case, the court explained that the proper district was generally the district where Jones was confined because he was challenging conditions at his prison. Kern Valley State Prison is in Kern County, which is in the Eastern District of California.

If the filing were a civil-rights complaint, the court held that venue was also proper in the Eastern District under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), because the complained-of acts occurred at the prison and many named defendants reside in that district.

Disposition

Judge Kandis A. Westmore ordered the Clerk of Court to terminate any pending motions and transfer the case to the Eastern District of California. The order transferred the case without deciding whether the filing was a habeas petition or civil-rights complaint, and it did not reach the merits of Jones’s allegations.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.