Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled July 30, 2021

Kishor v. Matteson

Judge
Kandis Westmore
Docket
4:21-cv-05027
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Kishor v. Matteson, Judge Westmore transferred a health-related prison-release habeas petition to California’s Eastern District and terminated pending motions.

Who this affects

Chandra Kishor’s habeas petition was transferred to the Eastern District of California, and all pending motions were terminated on the Northern District’s docket; the order did not resolve the petition’s merits.

What happened

In Kishor v. Matteson, Chandra Kishor, a California state prisoner proceeding without a lawyer, sought expedited release through a federal petition because of health conditions and COVID-19 conditions at the prison.

The court said the case belonged in the Eastern District of California because both the prison and the Sacramento County court that convicted and sentenced Kishor are there.

Judge Kandis A. Westmore ordered the action transferred to the Eastern District under federal venue rules and terminated all pending motions on the Northern District’s docket.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kishor v. Matteson · No. 4:21-cv-05027
Judge
Kandis Westmore
Date
July 30, 2021

Background

Chandra Kishor, an inmate at California State Prison, Solano, proceeding without a lawyer, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 seeking expedited release. He said that underlying health conditions made him susceptible to COVID-19 and that the prison’s COVID-19 protocols were unsafe and inadequate. Kishor was convicted and sentenced in Sacramento County Superior Court.

Venue analysis

The court explained that a state prisoner’s federal habeas petition may be filed in either the federal district where the prisoner is confined or the district where the prisoner was convicted. The court also may transfer the petition to the proper district in the interest of justice. Because California State Prison, Solano, and Sacramento County are both in the Eastern District of California, the court concluded that the Eastern District was the proper venue. The court stated that this would also be true if Kishor were challenging his conviction or sentence rather than the conditions related to carrying out his sentence.

Ruling

Judge Kandis A. Westmore ordered the Clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) and the district’s habeas rule. The order also stated that all pending motions were terminated on the Northern District’s docket. The court did not decide the merits of Kishor’s request for release or his allegations about the prison’s COVID-19 conditions.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.