Farris v. 3M Company
- Jon Tigar
- 4:18-cv-04186
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 1
In Farris v. 3M Company, Judge Tigar dismissed the case with prejudice because plaintiffs failed to follow pretrial orders and did not appear.
The plaintiffs' case against 3M Company and the other defendants was dismissed with prejudice.
What happened
In Farris v. 3M Company, the court had ordered the plaintiffs to file a pretrial statement by November 6, 2020 and required the parties to attend a pretrial conference.
No pretrial statement was filed, and no party appeared at the conference. The court concluded that the plaintiffs were no longer pursuing the case and dismissed it with prejudice.
Judge Jon S. Tigar entered the dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), which permits dismissal for failure to comply with a court order.
The detailed version
- Farris v. 3M Company · No. 4:18-cv-04186
- Jon Tigar
- Nov. 13, 2020
Background
The court had ordered the parties to file a pretrial statement by November 6, 2020 and to appear at a pretrial conference. No pretrial statement was filed by the deadline, and no party appeared at the conference.
Ruling
The court concluded that the plaintiffs were no longer prosecuting the case. It dismissed the case with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), based on the plaintiffs' failure to comply with the court's order. A dismissal with prejudice bars the case from being brought again.
Effect
The dismissal ended the plaintiffs' case against 3M Company and the other defendants. The order did not address the underlying claims on their merits.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.