Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 16, 2021

V.G.M. v. City of Salinas

Judge
Beth Freeman
Docket
5:19-cv-08007
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureEvidence
In one sentence

In V.G.M. v. City of Salinas, Judge Freeman granted a motion to seal agreements and an email because they were unrelated to the case’s merits.

Who this affects

The respondent’s Exhibits A through C were ordered filed under seal.

What happened

In V.G.M. v. City of Salinas, the respondent asked to file three exhibits under seal while responding to the court’s order to show cause. The exhibits included retainer agreements and an email.

The court applied the lower “good cause” standard because it found the records were not related to the merits of the case. The order did not decide the parties’ underlying claims.

The court granted the administrative motion and ordered the referenced documents filed under seal. Judge Beth Labson Freeman signed the order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
V.G.M. v. City of Salinas · No. 5:19-cv-08007
Judge
Beth Freeman
Date
Feb. 16, 2021

Background

The respondent filed an administrative motion to place certain documents under seal in connection with its response to an order to show cause. The documents were:

- Exhibit A: a retainer agreement concerning the matter; - Exhibit B: copies of retainer agreements concerning the matter; and - Exhibit C: an email from Melissa Nold dated August 3, 2020, concerning the matter.

Court’s Analysis

Under Civil Local Rule 79-5(d), the court determined that the “good cause” standard applied. The court relied on the finding that the records were not related to the merits of the case. The good-cause standard is a showing that supports restricting public access to the documents.

Disposition

The court granted the respondent’s administrative motion and ordered the referenced documents filed under seal. The order addressed only the filing status of those documents and did not resolve the underlying claims in V.G.M. v. City of Salinas.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.