Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 9, 2021

Bledsoe v. Granberry

Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Docket
4:21-cv-02604
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Bledsoe v. Granberry, Magistrate Judge Barnes transferred the copyright case to the Northern District of California because venue was improper.

Who this affects

Donnell Bledsoe’s copyright-infringement action was transferred from the Eastern District of California to the Northern District of California; the order did not decide the merits or state the disposition of the request to proceed without paying the filing fee.

What happened

Bledsoe v. Granberry concerns Donnell Bledsoe’s allegations of copyright infringement against Shawn Granberry and others. Bledsoe was representing himself and also asked to proceed without paying the filing fee.

The court found that the defendants lived in Oakland and that the alleged infringement occurred in Oakland and Emeryville, all in the Northern District of California. The court therefore determined that the Eastern District of California was not the proper venue for the action.

Magistrate Judge Orah Barnes ordered the action transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California under the federal venue-transfer statute. The order did not decide whether copyright infringement occurred.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Bledsoe v. Granberry · No. 4:21-cv-02604
Judge
Yvonne Rogers
Date
Apr. 9, 2021

Background

Donnell Bledsoe, who was proceeding without a lawyer, alleged copyright infringement against Shawn Granberry and other defendants. Before the court were Bledsoe’s second amended complaint and his request to proceed without paying the filing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

In an earlier order, the court dismissed the original complaint while allowing Bledsoe to file an amended complaint. That order questioned whether the Eastern District of California was the proper venue. Bledsoe then filed a second amended complaint stating that the defendants resided in Oakland, California, and that the alleged infringement took place in Oakland and Emeryville, California.

Venue analysis

The court explained that a federal civil action generally may be filed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction. The court also stated that it could raise improper venue on its own.

Based on the second amended complaint, the court concluded that the defendants’ residences and the events giving rise to the claim were in the Northern District of California. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406, a court may dismiss an action filed in the wrong district or transfer it to a district where it could have been brought.

Disposition

Magistrate Judge Orah Barnes ordered that the action be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The order addressed venue and did not decide the merits of Bledsoe’s copyright-infringement allegations.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.