Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled May 18, 2021

Alcazar v. Fashion Nova, Inc.

Judge
Jon Tigar
Docket
4:20-cv-01434
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Alcazar v. Fashion Nova, Judge Tigar rescheduled a conference and ordered Fashion Nova and its counsel to explain why sanctions should not be imposed.

Who this affects

Fashion Nova, Inc. and its counsel, who were ordered to respond to the court’s directive concerning possible monetary sanctions.

What happened

In Alcazar v. Fashion Nova, Inc., the scheduled case-management conference did not occur because Fashion Nova’s lawyer failed to appear. Court staff tried contacting that lawyer and another attorney identified by an automatic out-of-office message, but both messages also indicated they were unavailable.

The court scheduled another case-management conference and said no updated case-management statement was required. The order does not decide the parties’ underlying dispute.

Judge Tigar ordered Fashion Nova and its counsel to explain why monetary sanctions should not be imposed. Their written response was due May 25, 2021, and the court gave them until the next scheduled conference to be heard.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Alcazar v. Fashion Nova, Inc. · No. 4:20-cv-01434
Judge
Jon Tigar
Date
May 18, 2021

Background

The court had scheduled a case-management conference for 2:00 p.m. Defendant Fashion Nova, Inc.’s counsel did not appear. The courtroom deputy emailed the attorney of record and received an automatic out-of-office response directing her to another attorney. The second attorney’s email also produced an automatic out-of-office response. As a result, the conference did not proceed as scheduled.

Court’s Actions

The court scheduled a further case-management conference for June 15, 2020, at 2:00 p.m., and stated that an updated case-management statement was not required. The order also directed Fashion Nova and its counsel to show cause—meaning to explain—why the court should not impose monetary sanctions. The court cited its authority to impose sanctions for willful disobedience of a court order after notice and an opportunity to be heard. A written response was due May 25, 2021.

Disposition

In Alcazar v. Fashion Nova, Inc., Judge Jon S. Tigar rescheduled the case-management conference and issued an order to show cause regarding possible monetary sanctions against Fashion Nova and its counsel. The order did not impose monetary sanctions or decide the underlying claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.