Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Oct. 7, 2021

Quintara Biosciences, Inc. v. Ruifeng Biztech Inc.

Judge
William Alsup
Docket
3:20-cv-04808
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Quintara Biosciences v. Ruifeng Biztech, Judge Alsup granted counsel’s withdrawal for four defendants but denied it for two others.

Who this affects

Buchalter was permitted to withdraw from representing Ruifeng Biztech Inc., RF Biotech LLC, Gangyou Wang, and Alan Li, but remained counsel for Rui Shao and Alex Wong.

What happened

In Quintara Biosciences, Inc. v. Ruifeng Biztech Inc., defense counsel Buchalter asked to stop representing the defendants. Quintara Biosciences argued that changing counsel at that stage would unfairly harm its case.

The court found good cause to allow Buchalter to withdraw for Ruifeng Biztech Inc., RF Biotech LLC, Gangyou Wang, and Alan Li. The court denied the request for Rui Shao and Alex Wong.

Judge William Alsup ordered that Buchalter’s representation of the four specified parties ended at 12:00 a.m. on October 8, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Quintara Biosciences, Inc. v. Ruifeng Biztech Inc. · No. 3:20-cv-04808
Judge
William Alsup
Date
Oct. 7, 2021

Background

Defense counsel Buchalter moved to withdraw as counsel of record for the defendants. Quintara Biosciences opposed the motion, arguing that a change in counsel at that point in the litigation would be highly prejudicial. The court held an in-person hearing after proper notice. Gangyou Wang and Alan Li did not appear, despite repeated requests from counsel.

Legal standard

Under Civil Local Rule 11-5, a lawyer may not withdraw from a case until the court permits the withdrawal after advance written notice to the client and other parties who have appeared. The court explained that permission is discretionary and is guided by the California Rules of Professional Conduct, which allow withdrawal when counsel has a good-faith belief that good cause exists.

Ruling

After reviewing the written materials, including a declaration from defense counsel submitted privately for the court’s review, and testimony from some named defendants at the hearing, the court found good cause for withdrawal. The motion was granted as to Ruifeng Biztech Inc., RF Biotech LLC, Gangyou Wang, and Alan Li. Buchalter’s representation of those parties ended at 12:00 a.m. on October 8, 2021. The motion was denied as to Rui Shao and Alex Wong.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.