Gates v. Superior Loan Servicing
- William Orrick
- 3:21-cv-06369
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Gates v. Superior Loan Servicing, Judge Orrick found the conference-continuance request moot and ordered immediate service of process, warning the injunction could be dissolved.
Tyrious Gates and Superior Loan Servicing; the order required Gates or his counsel to serve Superior and warned that the preliminary injunction could be dissolved if he failed to comply.
What happened
In Gates v. Superior Loan Servicing, Tyrious Gates asked to postpone a case-management conference that he believed was scheduled for November 18, 2021. The court explained that no conference was scheduled for that day because the earlier date had been canceled after the case was reassigned.
Gates’s motion also showed that he had not formally served Superior Loan Servicing with the lawsuit. The court ordered Gates or his lawyer to serve Superior immediately under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 and to file a sworn declaration by 5:00 p.m. on November 22, 2021, confirming that service had been sent.
The court treated the request to postpone the conference as moot and warned that failing to serve Superior or file the required declaration could lead to dissolution of the preliminary injunction. Judge William H. Orrick issued the order.
The detailed version
- Gates v. Superior Loan Servicing · No. 3:21-cv-06369
- William Orrick
- Nov. 19, 2021
Background
Tyrious Gates moved to continue a case-management conference that he believed was scheduled for November 18, 2021. The court stated that no conference was scheduled for that date. The date apparently came from an initial case-management order issued before the case was reassigned; the reassignment order had canceled that date.
The motion also revealed that Gates had not formally served Superior Loan Servicing with process. More than two months earlier, after Gates filed a motion for a temporary restraining order, the court had ordered the plaintiff’s counsel to serve Superior with process and a copy of that order immediately. Gates had filed an affidavit stating that he had completed service, but the court determined that the affidavit referred only to service of the temporary restraining order, not service of process.
Ruling
The court stated that the request to continue the case-management conference was moot because no conference was set for that day. The court separately ordered Gates to serve Superior with process immediately under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. Gates or his counsel also had to file a declaration under penalty of perjury stating that service had been dispatched by 5:00 p.m. on November 22, 2021.
The court explained that service of process is necessary for a court to assert personal jurisdiction over a defendant. It warned that failure to complete service or file the required declaration could result in dissolution of the preliminary injunction. Judge William H. Orrick signed the order.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.