Lazor v. Atchley
- Edward Chen
- 3:21-cv-04038
- U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
- 2
In Free Lazor v. Atchley, Judge Chen dismissed Lazor’s habeas petition because photocopies are not available through habeas.
Free Lazor, whose habeas petition sought photocopies of documents rather than release-related relief.
What happened
In Free Lazor v. Atchley, Free Lazor, a prisoner representing himself, filed a petition seeking photocopies of documents from an earlier habeas case.
The court dismissed the petition because habeas proceedings provide relief related to immediate or speedier release, not photocopies of court records. The court noted that Lazor could seek the records through the Federal Records Center.
Judge Edward M. Chen issued the dismissal on December 29, 2021.
The detailed version
- Lazor v. Atchley · No. 3:21-cv-04038
- Edward Chen
- Dec. 29, 2021
Background
Free Lazor, a prisoner representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2243. The petition sought photocopies of documents filed in an earlier habeas case. The opinion states that the earlier case had been dismissed and that its file had been sent to the Federal Records Center.
Court’s reasoning
The court reviewed the petition under the procedure governing petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. It explained that habeas relief is available to prisoners seeking immediate or speedier release from confinement. Because photocopies would not provide that type of relief, the court concluded that the requested relief was unavailable in a habeas action. The court also explained that claims outside the core of habeas corpus may instead be brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, but it did not convert Lazor’s petition into a § 1983 action.
Ruling
The court dismissed the petition. It did not state that the dismissal was with or without prejudice. For Lazor’s benefit, the court provided information about the location of the earlier case file and how to obtain court documents from the Federal Records Center. Judge Edward M. Chen signed the order.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.