Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
Back to docket
N.D. Cal.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 29, 2021

Lazor v. Atchley

Judge
Edward Chen
Docket
3:21-cv-04038
Court
U.S. District Court · Northern District of California
Pages
2
HabeasCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Free Lazor v. Atchley, Judge Chen dismissed Lazor’s habeas petition because photocopies are not available through habeas.

Who this affects

Free Lazor, whose habeas petition sought photocopies of documents rather than release-related relief.

What happened

In Free Lazor v. Atchley, Free Lazor, a prisoner representing himself, filed a petition seeking photocopies of documents from an earlier habeas case.

The court dismissed the petition because habeas proceedings provide relief related to immediate or speedier release, not photocopies of court records. The court noted that Lazor could seek the records through the Federal Records Center.

Judge Edward M. Chen issued the dismissal on December 29, 2021.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Lazor v. Atchley · No. 3:21-cv-04038
Judge
Edward Chen
Date
Dec. 29, 2021

Background

Free Lazor, a prisoner representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2243. The petition sought photocopies of documents filed in an earlier habeas case. The opinion states that the earlier case had been dismissed and that its file had been sent to the Federal Records Center.

Court’s reasoning

The court reviewed the petition under the procedure governing petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. It explained that habeas relief is available to prisoners seeking immediate or speedier release from confinement. Because photocopies would not provide that type of relief, the court concluded that the requested relief was unavailable in a habeas action. The court also explained that claims outside the core of habeas corpus may instead be brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, but it did not convert Lazor’s petition into a § 1983 action.

Ruling

The court dismissed the petition. It did not state that the dismissal was with or without prejudice. For Lazor’s benefit, the court provided information about the location of the earlier case file and how to obtain court documents from the Federal Records Center. Judge Edward M. Chen signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.